Files
volt-vmm/benchmarks/results-template.md
Karl Clinger 40ed108dd5 Volt VMM (Neutron Stardust): source-available under AGPSL v5.0
KVM-based microVMM for the Volt platform:
- Sub-second VM boot times
- Minimal memory footprint
- Landlock LSM + seccomp security
- Virtio device support
- Custom kernel management

Copyright (c) Armored Gates LLC. All rights reserved.
Licensed under AGPSL v5.0
2026-03-21 01:04:35 -05:00

164 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

# Volt Network Benchmark Results
## Test Environment
| Parameter | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Date | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Host CPU | Intel Xeon E-2288G @ 3.70GHz |
| Host RAM | 64GB DDR4-2666 |
| Host NIC | Intel X710 10GbE |
| Host Kernel | 6.1.0-xx-amd64 |
| VM vCPUs | 4 |
| VM RAM | 8GB |
| Guest Kernel | 6.1.0-xx-amd64 |
| QEMU Version | 8.x.x |
## Test Configuration
- Duration: 30 seconds per test
- Ping count: 1000 packets
- iperf3 parallel streams: 8 (multi-stream tests)
---
## Results
### Throughput (Gbps)
| Test | virtio | vhost-net | macvtap |
|------|--------|-----------|---------|
| TCP Single Stream | | | |
| TCP Multi-8 Stream | | | |
| UDP Maximum | | | |
| TCP Reverse | | | |
### Latency (microseconds)
| Metric | virtio | vhost-net | macvtap |
|--------|--------|-----------|---------|
| ICMP P50 | | | |
| ICMP P95 | | | |
| ICMP P99 | | | |
| TCP P50 | | | |
| TCP P99 | | | |
### Packets Per Second
| Packet Size | virtio | vhost-net | macvtap |
|-------------|--------|-----------|---------|
| 64 bytes | | | |
| 128 bytes | | | |
| 256 bytes | | | |
| 512 bytes | | | |
### Transaction Rates (trans/sec)
| Test | virtio | vhost-net | macvtap |
|------|--------|-----------|---------|
| TCP_RR | | | |
| TCP_CRR | | | |
| UDP_RR | | | |
---
## Analysis
### Throughput Analysis
**TCP Single Stream:**
- virtio: X Gbps (baseline)
- vhost-net: X Gbps (Y% improvement)
- macvtap: X Gbps (Y% improvement)
**Key Finding:** [Describe the performance differences]
### Latency Analysis
**P99 Latency:**
- virtio: X µs
- vhost-net: X µs
- macvtap: X µs
**Jitter (P99/P50 ratio):**
- virtio: X.Xx
- vhost-net: X.Xx
- macvtap: X.Xx
**Key Finding:** [Describe latency characteristics]
### PPS Analysis
**64-byte Packets (best overhead indicator):**
- virtio: X pps
- vhost-net: X pps (Y% improvement)
- macvtap: X pps (Y% improvement)
**Key Finding:** [Describe per-packet overhead differences]
---
## Conclusions
### Performance Hierarchy
1. **macvtap** - Best for:
- Maximum throughput requirements
- Lowest latency needs
- When host NIC can be dedicated
2. **vhost-net** - Best for:
- Multi-tenant environments
- Good balance of performance and flexibility
- Standard production workloads
3. **virtio** - Best for:
- Development/testing
- Maximum portability
- When performance is not critical
### Recommendations
For Volt production VMs:
- Default: `vhost-net` (best balance)
- High-performance option: `macvtap` (when applicable)
- Compatibility fallback: `virtio`
### Anomalies or Issues
[Document any unexpected results, test failures, or areas needing investigation]
---
## Raw Data
Full test results available in:
- `results/virtio/TIMESTAMP/`
- `results/vhost-net/TIMESTAMP/`
- `results/macvtap/TIMESTAMP/`
---
## Reproducibility
To reproduce these results:
```bash
# On server VM
iperf3 -s -D
sockperf sr --daemonize
netserver
# On client VM (for each backend)
./run-all.sh <server-ip> virtio
./run-all.sh <server-ip> vhost-net
./run-all.sh <server-ip> macvtap
# Generate comparison
./compare.sh results/
```
---
*Report generated by Volt Benchmark Suite*